Avici pays out of a crypto balance, but its strict transaction caps are the deal-breaker for most people
Avici is a Visa payment card that you top up with crypto and then spend like an ordinary card, in stores, online and at cash machines. On paper it is one of the cleanest versions of that idea: two tiers, virtual and physical, no per-transaction fee, a stated 0% forex markup, and a self-custodial escrow contract instead of a pooled custodial balance. In practice it also carries limits that most people would find restrictive — $1,000 per transaction, $3,000 a day, three transactions a day — and it is closed to residents of the EU, Georgia, Serbia, Armenia and Kazakhstan. I scored it 6.1 out of 10, and the reason is not the fees. It is the caps, plus how little the public pages say about who stands behind the card.
Conditions are current as of October 28, 2026.
Verdict: 6.1 / 10, best for people already holding USDC
The score is 6.1 out of 10. If you already hold USDC, you live in one of the 49 listed regions, and you mostly want to convert crypto into everyday spending without a bank in the middle, the card does what it says. If you are looking for an everyday banking replacement, or you live in Europe, this is not the card for you.

Let me show you the breakdown, criterion by criterion, because the shape of the total matters more than the number. The strong column is everyday use; the weak ones are cost and top-up options.
| Criterion | Mark | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Who can get it | 7 / 10 | Issued to residents of 49 listed regions including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Japan, the UAE and the USA; 17 countries are closed |
| Cost | 5 / 10 | Virtual Platinum 15 USD for the first card, physical Platinum 50 USD, Signature 30 USD in the first year and 20 USD per year after; transaction fee 0 USD, FX 0% |
| Top-up options | 5 / 10 | Top-up in USDC through a Loan Escrow smart contract; no other coins officially. Unofficial: any token via Relay auto-swap on EVM L2 or Solana |
| Reliability and complaints | 5 / 10 | Avici Inc., San Francisco, partner Third National, licences not disclosed; Trustpilot 3.5 out of 5 across 5 reviews, one about a 20,000 EUR payment block |
| Everyday use | 9 / 10 | Virtual and physical Visa, Apple Pay and Google Pay, ATM: Platinum 1 USD + 0.65%, Signature 0 USD |
| Total | 6.1 / 10 | — |
Everyday use scores highest because the card does the ordinary things well: a Visa number, virtual and physical, tap-to-pay with Apple Pay and Google Pay, and an ATM fee that is either zero or cheap depending on the tier. Cost sits in the middle rather than high because the headline numbers look generous — zero transaction fee, zero forex markup — but you still pay for the card itself, and a Visa cross-border fee of 0.4–1% can appear on non-USD payments. Top-up options score low simply because officially there is one coin and one mechanism; the broader network support comes from third-party sites, not from Avici.
Reliability is where I have the least to go on, and I want to be straight about that. There is no statement of official incidents on the card’s pages. What exists is a handful of unverified user reports: a 31 Mar 2026 review describing a business-account user whose EUR 20,000 incoming payment was credited and then blocked, with the account restricted and support silent, and a January 2026 review about a repeated login error at email and authenticator verification. That is a tiny sample, and I treat it as a warning rather than a pattern. Against it sits a Trustpilot score of 3.5 out of 5 from five reviews, one of which is the payment block.
Who the card suits, in plain terms: residents of Latin America and the UAE who hold USDC. Those are the two groups where a crypto-funded Visa solves a real friction — access to a card that a local bank will not straightforwardly issue against crypto holdings — and where the currency of the balance, US dollars, matches how much of their spending is priced.
Will they give you the card?
Mostly, if you live in one of 49 listed regions — but there is a long list of places where the answer is no, and a separate list of places where you could hold the card yet still not spend.
The list of eligible regions has 49 entries and includes Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Singapore, Thailand, the United Arab Emirates, South Africa and the USA, subject to a supported-states list. What is absent is as informative as what is present: no EU countries appear, and neither do Georgia, Serbia, Armenia or Kazakhstan. If you are in any of those, the answer at the top of this section is simply no.
Two further lists matter, and they do different things. Residence in Belarus, China (Mainland), Cuba, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, North Korea, Russia, Syria, Turkey, Ukraine, Venezuela or Vietnam is prohibited — you cannot be issued the card. And spending is prohibited in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Syria, Ukraine and Venezuela. That second list is the one that catches people out: holding a valid card does not mean you can use it everywhere. If your travel includes any of those countries, the card is useless there.
One thing the card’s public pages do not state is the citizenship rule. Residence and ID rules are laid out; what happens if you live in a supported region but hold a passport from somewhere else is not said. If that is your situation, the verification step is where you find out.
How to get it
You sign up with an email address, verify once, and the card appears in the app. Marketing says the card is ready in 2 minutes; the verification itself is described as taking “about 2 minutes” or “no more than a few minutes”.
Here is the verification as described: a single verification via Sumsub after email sign-up, covering your personal details, ID documents and a liveness check. Your KYC data is shared with the card’s partners, and Sumsub runs AML monitoring of both users and on-chain funds. Business accounts have separate verification. Proof of address is not mentioned, and neither are the specific document types accepted or the reasons a check might be rejected — worth knowing before you start, because you may find out by failing.
The card itself is a Visa, described with secured credit-card wording. You get virtual cards by category — subscriptions, groceries, travel — and a physical card is delivered as well. The currency is not stated.
On delivery: standard shipping is free and untracked, taking 3–4 weeks. Priority tracked shipping costs $50 internationally, arriving in 1–2 weeks, or $15 in the US, where the timing is not stated. Which countries the physical card ships to, and what a replacement costs, are not stated either. So if you need the metal-free plastic in your hand quickly and you are outside the US, budget $50 and 1–2 weeks; if you can wait, the free option is free but untracked, which is a real difference when you are waiting on a bank account in the post.
Fees: what it really costs
The advertised headline is “No Hidden Fee”, “No Gas Fee, No Interchange Fee” — but no amounts accompany those words on the card’s pages, and the conversion and FX percentages are not stated there either. The numbers below are the ones the tier pages do publish, plus the limits you will hit before the fees matter much.

| Fee or limit | Platinum | Signature |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual card, first card | $15 | $30 first year, then $20/year |
| Virtual card, later cards | $10 one-time | included |
| Physical card | $50 one-time | $75 plus $20/year from year two |
| Transaction fee | $0 | $0 |
| Forex markup | 0% | 0% |
| ATM withdrawal | $1 + 0.65% | $0 |
| Declined transaction | $0.60 | $0 |
| Balance inquiry | $0.60 | $0 |
| Per transaction limit | $1,000 | $1,000 |
| Daily limit | $3,000 | $3,000 |
| Transactions per day | 3 | 3 |
Two Visa tiers exist, each available as virtual or physical: Platinum and Signature. An “Infinite” card is listed as coming soon. No metal card is mentioned. Signature costs more up front and saves you the ATM fee, the declined-transaction fee and the balance-inquiry fee; whether that trade pays depends entirely on how often you take out cash.
Now the three everyday payments, because that is where the table stops being abstract.
Paying 40 USD for groceries in a USD shop, on the Platinum virtual card. You have USDC in the balance, the price is in dollars, and nothing converts. Transaction fee 0 USD, conversion cost 0 USD, FX does not apply because there is no other currency. Total: the price, nothing else. This is the case the card is built for.
Paying 40 EUR in a European shop. The native currency of the balance is USD and the forex markup is 0%, but Visa may charge a 0.4–1% cross-border fee on non-USD transactions. On 40 EUR that is a fraction of a euro, but it is not zero, and the merchant may add their own. Note also that if you are a resident of the EU you cannot be issued this card at all — so this scenario applies to you only if you are in a supported region spending abroad. Multi-currency balances are not stated, so holding euros natively is not a documented feature.
Taking 200 USD out of a cash machine in Mexico City, on Platinum. The fee is $1 + 0.65%, so $1.30, plus whatever the ATM operator adds on top — the card’s own pages do not state that part. On Signature the same withdrawal costs 0 USD from the issuer’s side. The withdrawal also counts against the limits below: $1,000 per transaction, $3,000 a day, three transactions a day.
That last point is the real cost of this card, and it is not priced. The only claim about volume on the card’s pages is “No transaction limits” — no figures. What the tier pages actually publish is the opposite: $1,000 per transaction, $3,000 daily, three transactions per day. There is also a statement that there are no transaction limits “by default”, with per-card limits settable in your settings. One third-party site, kkinvesting.io on 20 Oct 2026, reports a daily ATM limit of $250 and a maximum of three transactions, which contradicts the official figures above; I have kept the official ones. Practically: three payments a day is not a monthly budget, it is a day’s worth of ordinary spending. A weekly shop, a fuel stop and a coffee fits. A month of everything does not.
How to top it up
You fund the card by depositing crypto into a Loan Escrow smart contract; that deposit creates the USD credit balance the card spends from. Officially the coin is USDC, and no other is listed. There is no top-up fee and no fee for withdrawing back to your wallet, and no minimum top-up is stated. Fiat top-up options are not stated.
The mechanics are worth understanding because they explain both the strength and the catch. The escrow is self-custodial: your wallet owns the contract, and you can withdraw the remaining funds after spends are deducted. The provider can only withdraw funds tied to spend charges. And spent USDC is liquidated from the contract every 1–2 days, sometimes weekly — so your money is not sitting idle in your own wallet while you spend it.
The catch is that this is a loan structure, and that word does real work. The documentation names a third party, Third National, as a party to the loan contract while stating that neither Third National, Avici nor Visa controls it. What that means for you in practice is a question the pages do not answer in plain terms, and it is worth reading those contract terms yourself before you commit meaningful sums.
Third-party summaries fill some gaps, unofficial and not confirmed by the card: kkinvesting.io on 20 Oct 2026 reports a minimum top-up of $1 and arrival in 2–7 minutes, and another summary says top-ups can be in USDC or any token via Relay auto-swap on EVM L2 or Solana networks. I would plan for USDC only until Avici says otherwise.
Paying with it every day
Day to day, the card behaves like a Visa. You add it to Apple Pay or Google Pay and tap, and the card runs on self-custody with passkeys and account abstraction. Both virtual and physical versions are Visa. Spending categories that are blocked are not stated by the card — though kkinvesting.io on 20 Oct 2026 says spending is blocked in restricted categories including gambling, illegal drugs and financial institutions, with the latter needing additional approval. Unofficial, but it matches how card programmes of this type are usually configured.
The virtual cards are organised by category — subscriptions, groceries, travel — which is a genuinely useful feature if you want a card number that cannot be used for something else. It also means a freeze or a limit is one tap away on one card rather than an all-or-nothing decision.
The app: the homepage links “Download App” through a shortlink, and neither the platforms nor the App Store or Google Play ratings are stated. That is a small thing, but it is the difference between knowing what you are installing and not.
Rewards are listed as perks rather than as a rate: airline miles, rental car insurance, travel and restaurant perks, trip protection, and a mention of “Avenue to TradeFI rewards”. No cashback rate is stated. I would not include any rewards in your calculation of what this card is worth.
If verification goes wrong — you paid for the card and then did not complete or pass verification — the documented route is in-app support for a refund. What is not stated is the chargeback and disputed-payment process; the security page does not cover it. So if a purchase goes wrong the ordinary way, the card’s public documentation does not tell you how to fight it. That is a gap, and it is worth weighing before you rely on the card for anything you would miss.
What can go wrong
Four things, in descending order of how much they should worry you.
The limits. Covered above, but it belongs here too. $1,000 per transaction, $3,000 a day, three transactions a day is the constraint that shapes everything.
Blocked payments and accounts. The most serious report I found is a 31 Mar 2026 review describing a business-account user whose incoming EUR 20,000 payment was credited and then blocked, with the account restricted, support silent and no refund. There is also a January 2026 review about a repeated login error at email and authenticator verification. Neither is confirmed; both are single, tiny-sample, self-reported. But the pattern they describe — money arriving, then the account freezing — is exactly the failure mode of any card programme, and here the support response times are not stated anywhere on the pages I read.
Who is actually behind the card. Avici Inc. is at 300 4th St, San Francisco, CA 94107. The issuer/BIN sponsor and its licences are not stated. The docs name “Third National” as a party to the loan contract structure, without detailing its role. Unofficial reporting from kkinvesting.io on 20 Oct 2026 names Rain as the issuing partner and says KYC data is shared with it. I would treat all of that as unconfirmed. What it means practically: when something goes wrong, the documentation you hold does not tell you which regulated entity is responsible for it.
Timing and staleness of the paperwork. The docs pages carry real dates, and they are not recent: the Prohibitions page was last updated 19 Aug 2025, the Terms of Service for the Avici Card on 23 Jun 2025, the Business Program Terms on 16 Oct 2025. The docs index also lists Business Cards, Credit Line, Markets and Grow products, so the card is one line of a wider company.
The security controls in the app are the good news: freeze (a temporary stop of spending), permanent cancel, per-card spending limits, a PIN, and show/hide card details. Two-factor authentication, passkeys and insurance are not stated on the security page, though the homepage mentions passkeys. Support is not stated — the docs pages name no support channel other than in-app support for verification refunds, and neither languages nor hours are given.
For context on how this industry behaves generally: crypto platforms have a documented history of failure, with Mt. Gox, Coincheck and Ronin Network among the largest losses on record. That is why the self-custodial escrow design here is a genuine point in the card’s favour — your wallet owns the contract. It is also why the flip side matters: with self-custody, a lost key or a copied address has no recovery path, because blockchain transfers cannot be reversed.
What to take instead
I compared four cards. The scores are mine, on the same ten-point scale: TokenPocket 5.8, Avici 6.1, KAST 6.1, MetaMask 7.1.
None of them solves your problem exactly the same way, which is why the comparison is worth walking through rather than ranking on price.
| Card | Score | Card type | Who it is for | Cost headline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avici | 6.1 / 10 | Visa, virtual and physical | Residents of 49 listed regions holding USDC | Transaction fee 0 USD, FX markup 0% |
| TokenPocket | 5.8 / 10 | Visa/Mastercard debit, virtual | Europe and a wider APAC list | 1% fee on crypto deposits, no other fees |
| KAST | 6.1 / 10 | Visa Platinum, Infinite metal, Infinite gold; virtual and physical | Residence-based list checked at KYC | 0 USD Standard, 1,000 USD/year Premium, 10,000 USD/year Private |
| MetaMask | 7.1 / 10 | Mastercard, virtual then metal | Sign-up open in 45 listed countries | Virtual free, metal $199/year |
MetaMask scores highest, at 7.1. It is a Mastercard, virtual card issued instantly, with a metal card you can pre-order after approval, one card per user; the issuer is Monovate and the card provider Crypto Life. The virtual card is free with no annual or maintenance fee; the metal is $199 a year. Fees are described as a minimal per-transaction fee with no additional MetaMask fees and no foreign transaction fee, using the Mastercard rate — the amount is not stated on the pages I read. It spends directly from your connected wallet on Linea, Base, Monad and Solana, with mUSD, wETH, EURe, GBPe, USDC and USDT named. Cashback in mUSD is 1% on Virtual and a headline 3% on Metal, footnoted to 3% on the first $10,000 spent then 1%. Sign-up is open in 45 listed countries including Andorra, Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Germany, France, Spain and Uruguay; proof of residency is required; other regions join a waitlist, and “ineligible regions limit sign-ups, not spending”. US and UK sign-ups are temporarily closed per the FAQ. The catch: it is metal-only at a price, or virtual with a smaller reward.
KAST ties Avici at 6.1 and is the more interesting comparison, because it does more of the things people actually ask a card for. It offers up to 10 cards per user, and the range runs from Visa Platinum Standard to Visa Infinite metal (Premium) and Infinite gold plated (Private), plus Pengu, Solana and Bitcoin designs. Balances are in USD from stablecoin deposits converted 1:1 at 0% spread. The membership ladder is stark: Standard 0 USD, Premium 1,000 USD/year, Private 10,000 USD/year, billed annually upfront with no monthly option; extra virtual cards 2 USD; a Standard physical card is 0 USD plus 40 USD delivery, while Premium and Private physical cards are included; there is a 1 USD per month inactivity fee after 12 months. Fees: stablecoin top-up 0%, card spend in USD 0%, transaction fee 0%, Apple and Google Pay 0%, non-USD FX 0.5%–1.75% depending on your residence country, the transaction country and the card programme, 0.10 USD for non-USD transactions under 25 USD, 0.50 USD for a declined transaction on insufficient balance, and non-stablecoin tokens may be auto-converted at a fee shown in the app. Cashback in USD is tiered: 1.5% on the first 2,000 USD/month for Standard, 2% on the first 10,000 USD/month for Premium, 3% on the first 40,000 USD/month for Private. Funding is USDT, USDC, PYUSD and RLUSD, with USDT and USDC on Ethereum, Solana, Polygon, Arbitrum and TRON — though the terms say acceptable tokens are “currently USDT and USDC”, which conflicts with the app. Importantly, KAST is transparent where Avici is not: it publishes its restricted-locations list and tells you plainly that living in a supported country while holding an ID from a restricted region may still make you ineligible for KYC, that dual citizens with an ID from a supported country may pass, that only the account holder’s own ID is accepted, and that a VPN does not bypass it. You can create an account in an unsupported country, but KYC stays locked. Its practical drawback is the annual membership ladder — 1,000 USD a year for Premium is a real commitment — and its FX fee is higher than Avici’s 0% markup.
TokenPocket scores lowest, at 5.8. It is a Mastercard/Visa debit running on Arbitrum, virtual only as far as the pages describe, with balances in EUR24 and USD24. Coverage is a Visa debit for a list of European countries and territories including Germany, France, Spain and Switzerland, and a Mastercard debit for Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan, New Zealand, Singapore, South Korea and the UK among others; the Americas were “planned for Q2 2025”. On cost: an NFT creation fee partly covered by TokenPocket where you pay “a small portion”, and otherwise no additional fees. The catch is the funding side — a 1% fee on depositing cryptocurrency into the card, described as refundable later through rewards and reduced transaction fees, plus possible extra fees from inter-institution settlement. No cashback rate is stated.
The pattern across all four: Avici is the one with the lowest stated FX markup and a genuinely free ATM on its higher tier, and also the one with the tightest transaction limits and the thinnest public disclosure about the issuer.
Who I would recommend it to
Three groups, and honestly only three.
First, if you already hold USDC and want to spend it without converting through an exchange and a bank account, and you live in one of the 49 listed regions. The funding path is clean, the fee is 0 USD per transaction, and the escrow is self-custodial, which is the right default. Just respect the limits: three transactions a day, $3,000 a day.
Second, if you travel or receive money across borders in a region where a local card is awkward, and you mainly spend in US dollars. The 0% forex markup is the best number in this comparison, and Signature makes ATM withdrawals free.
Third, if you are a business with cross-border receipts and you are prepared for the verification and support friction. The one detailed complaint I found involves exactly that profile — an incoming EUR 20,000 payment credited and then blocked — so I would only suggest it to someone who can absorb that risk.
Who I would not suggest it to: anyone in the EU, Georgia, Serbia, Armenia or Kazakhstan, since the card is not issued there. Anyone in a prohibited residence country, obviously. Anyone who needs a large monthly spend through it, because three transactions a day is the binding constraint, not the fees. And anyone who is uneasy about an issuer whose licence details are not stated on the card’s own pages — that is not a small reservation, and it is the reason this card sits at 6.1 rather than higher.
Frequently asked questions
What is the Avici card?
Avici is a Visa payment card you fund with crypto. You deposit USDC into a Loan Escrow smart contract, that deposit creates a USD balance, and the card spends from it like a prepaid Visa — in shops, online, via Apple Pay and Google Pay, and at ATMs. It comes as Platinum and Signature tiers, each virtual or physical. An Infinite card is listed as coming soon. The escrow is self-custodial: your wallet owns the contract.
Is Avici a bank?
No, and its public pages do not claim to be. Avici Inc. is a company at 300 4th St, San Francisco, CA 94107, and it appears to run the card programme rather than hold a banking licence. The docs name Third National as a party to the loan contract without detailing its role, and one third-party site names Rain as the issuing partner — both unconfirmed by the card. Full issuer and licence details are not stated.
Who owns Avici?
Avici Inc. of San Francisco is the company behind it. Beyond that, ownership is not stated on the pages I read: the issuer and BIN sponsor are not disclosed, and the role of the named partner is not detailed. The docs index also lists Business Cards, Credit Line, Markets and Grow products, suggesting a wider company rather than a card-only business.
Is the Avici card available in my country?
Only if you live in one of 49 listed regions, which include Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Colombia, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Singapore, Thailand, the UAE, South Africa and the USA, subject to a supported-states list. No EU countries, Georgia, Serbia, Armenia or Kazakhstan appear. Residence in Belarus, China (Mainland), Cuba, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, North Korea, Russia, Syria, Turkey, Ukraine, Venezuela or Vietnam is prohibited. Citizenship rules are not stated.
How do I get the Avici card?
You sign up by email and complete one Sumsub verification covering personal details, ID documents and a liveness check, with ongoing AML monitoring of users and on-chain funds. Marketing says the card is ready in 2 minutes. Physical cards ship free and untracked in 3–4 weeks, or priority tracked for $50 internationally in 1–2 weeks, or $15 in the US where timing is not stated. Business accounts have separate verification.
Does the Avici card require KYC?
Yes. Sumsub verification is required after email sign-up, and your KYC data is shared with the card’s partners. Business accounts go through their own process. Proof of address is not mentioned, and neither are accepted document types or rejection reasons — so if your situation is unusual, expect to find out by failing rather than by reading.
How much does the Avici card cost?
Virtual Platinum is $15 for the first card and $10 one-time for each later one; physical Platinum is $50 one-time. Virtual Signature is $30 in the first year then $20 a year; physical Signature is $75 plus $20 a year from year two. Transaction fees are $0 and the forex markup is 0%, though Visa may charge 0.4–1% cross-border on non-USD payments. Platinum charges $1 + 0.65% per ATM withdrawal; Signature charges $0.
What are the Avici card’s limits?
Per transaction $1,000, daily $3,000, and three transactions per day on both tiers. The pages also claim “no transaction limits” by default with per-card limits settable in settings, which sits oddly beside the published caps. A third-party site reports a $250 daily ATM limit and three transactions, contradicting the official figures; one unexplained discrepancy worth keeping in mind.
Is the Avici card safe?
Partly, and it depends which risks you mean. Self-custodial escrow is a genuine plus: your wallet owns the contract, and neither the named partner, Avici nor Visa controls it. In-app controls include freeze, permanent cancel, per-card limits and a PIN. Against that: the issuer and its licences are not stated, blocked-payment reports exist, and self-custody means a lost key or a swapped address has no recovery path, since blockchain transfers cannot be reversed.
Is the Avici card worth it?
For someone holding USDC in a listed region, spending mainly in dollars and needing a card the crypto balance pays for directly, yes. For an everyday banking replacement, no: three transactions a day and $3,000 daily is the real ceiling, not the fees. I scored it 6.1 out of 10 — best on everyday use at 9, weakest on top-up options, cost and reliability at 5 each.
Wallet card reviews – cryptocardcheck
Content created by the «cryptocardcheck» team
