A crypto card with a visible rewards pitch and a very quiet public page

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

The Fasset card is a Visa card that spends US dollars from a crypto balance, aimed at people who already hold or receive stablecoins and want to pay with them rather than sell them first. On paper that is a useful idea: top up with USDT, spend at any Visa merchant worldwide, get a slice of some purchases back in gold-backed token. The marketing is coherent and the rewards rate is the most concrete number anywhere on the site.

What is not concrete is everything around it. The card’s public pages do not state the cost of issuing the card, any monthly fee, the conversion spread, the foreign-exchange treatment, cash withdrawal terms, or the daily and monthly limits. The list of countries is long and specific, but it appears only in the starting data, and one of the card’s own pages refused to load during checking. The company behind it is named — Fasset Labuan Limited — but the entity that issues the card is not, and no licence numbers are published. My overall mark is 5.3 out of 10, which is a card I can describe accurately but would struggle to recommend without a phone call first.

The conditions described here are current as of October 28, 2026.

Verdict: 5.3 / 10 — a promising idea with a public page that tells you almost nothing

Here is how I got to 5.3. The score is built from five criteria, each marked out of ten.

Two halves pull in opposite directions here, and you should weigh them yourself rather than let an average decide for you.

On the positive side, this is not a white label with no identity behind it. Fasset describes itself as a US-founded neobanking and investment platform, names its founders, Mohammad Raafi Hossain and Daniel Ahmed, who is CEO, and lists regulatory approvals in seven named jurisdictions. That is more than most cards in this category give you. The rewards structure is also the best-specified feature on the site: cashback of up to 6% in XAU₮ on eligible transactions, tiered so that the rate rises with your spending, credited to the wallet in real time, with Tether committing up to $1 million in XA₮ for rewards, plus a round-up feature that invests spare change to the nearest dollar in XAU₮. That is a real, articulated proposition, not a vague promise of “rewards”.

On the negative side, and this is what costs the points, the disclosure is thin exactly where your money is. Cost scored 5 not because the fees are high but because they are absent. Everyday use scored 4 because I could not confirm whether there is a plastic card at all. Reliability scored 6 — not higher — because the entity whose name would appear on your statement is missing, and a card without a visible issuer is a card where a support problem has nowhere obvious to go.

Who does this suit? Someone in Asia or Africa who lives in stablecoins, receives USDT regularly, and wants to convert the act of spending into an investment in gold rather than a round trip through a fiat account. If your money arrives in USDT and your landlord wants dollars, this is a fit. If you want to know the exact cost of a purchase before you make it, this is not a fit, because you cannot find that number on the public pages.

Will they give you the card?

The starting data lists a specific and unusual set of countries: Australia, Bangladesh, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand, Philippines, Singapore, Pakistan, Egypt, Ghana, Kenya, Morocco, South Africa, Uganda, Zambia, Côte d’Ivoire, Senegal, Antigua & Barbuda, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Grenada, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad & Tobago, and Turks & Caicos Islands.

That is 36 jurisdictions, and it tells you something real about where Fasset is aiming. It is not a Europe-first product and it is not restricted to a single licensing region. If you live in one of these places, you are in the intended audience. If you live somewhere not on that list, the card is not obviously for you, and you would be relying on a sign-up form to tell you no.

One thing to understand about this list: it is starting data. During my check the card page itself returned a 403 error and would not load. So I could not confirm the country list against the company’s own live page, only against the data the page produced before that. I would treat the list as a good indication of intent rather than a guaranteed eligibility test, and I would not rely on it for anything that matters until you see your own country accepted at the sign-up step.

What the card pages do not say is just as important. The identity verification requirement is not stated. I could not find whether there are different verification levels, what documents are asked for, or whether a face check is involved. Under the general rules that apply to regulated financial businesses, a card provider will almost certainly run some form of identity check — that is a legal obligation, not a product choice — but what it looks like for Fasset specifically is not described publicly. Expect to prove who you are; do not expect to know in advance how long it takes.

Note also that a card of this kind is generally aimed at adults. The usual floor is 18, and some issuers set higher limits or ages for particular products, but Fasset does not publish its own position here.

How to get it

The application route is straightforward in shape, even if the details are thin. You would start from Fasset’s own site, create an account as a user of the platform rather than of a bank, go through whatever identity process the app asks for, and then obtain the card. What I cannot tell you is how that process actually runs, because the sequence of steps is not described on the public pages, nor are the timing, the acceptance criteria, or what happens if verification fails.

The card itself is on the Visa network and spends US dollars at Visa merchants worldwide. The card name indicates a virtual card, and that is the only card format mentioned. Whether a physical card exists, whether one is issued in metal or plastic, and whether you can request one at all: not stated.

Delivery is also not stated. I found nothing about how long a card takes to arrive, whether it is shipped internationally, what the shipping cost is, or whether tracking is provided. If you are outside the company’s home region, this is a question worth asking before you rely on the card for anything time-sensitive, because a virtual card might be the only thing you get, and a physical card might take a while.

The honest summary: applying looks like joining a crypto platform first and adding a card afterwards, which is normal for this category. The specifics you would want — documents, timing, delivery — are not published, and getting them is a conversation with the company’s support, not something I can report to you.

Fees: what a payment actually costs you

This is the weakest section of the card, and the reason the cost criterion sits at 5 out of 10 rather than lower is only that the card’s own card page returned a 403 during checking, so a hidden fee page cannot be ruled out. Here is what the public pages actually say.

Four of these are genuine blanks rather than zeros, and the distinction matters. A card that publishes no FX fee may mean there is no FX fee. A card that publishes no conversion fee may mean conversion is free, or it may mean the answer is on a page that did not load. I am not going to guess which.

The one clearly specified currency fact is this: spending is in USD, at Visa merchants worldwide. If you are paid in another currency, something has to happen between the local price on the terminal and the US dollars your balance holds, and the card does not publish what that costs.

Now, three everyday payments, and what I can honestly say about each.

A coffee purchase. The amount leaves a US-dollar balance. What I cannot tell you is what, if anything, is deducted on top — whether there is a per-transaction fee, whether the balance was loaded with a conversion charge already baked in, or whether this purchase earns cashback in the tier you currently occupy. If the coffee is an eligible transaction at your current tier, part of it comes back in XAU₮, credited in real time. Whether coffee is eligible is not something the card states.

A $60 supermarket shop. Same structure, same unknowns. This is the purchase most people make most often, which is exactly why the absence of any spending-limit figure is worth noticing: a limit you do not know is a limit you cannot plan around, and it is the first thing support will ask you about when a payment fails unexpectedly.

Withdrawing $100 in cash. Here you are the least informed. The ATM appears in a press-release headline and nowhere in the body. Fee not stated, allowance not stated, which ATM networks are covered not stated. If cash access is important to you — and for many people it is the entire point of having a card — this is a decisive gap, and I would not sign up assuming it works.

Cashback deserves one more word, because it is the number most likely to be quoted at you. Up to 6% back in XAU₮ on eligible transactions, rising with spending tiers. That is genuinely more generous than most cards in this category offer. But “up to”, “eligible”, and “tiered” are doing real work in that sentence, and the tier thresholds and per-tier rates are not published. The reward is real; the arithmetic that tells you what you will actually earn is missing.

Top up: how money gets onto the card

The funding route is specific and narrow. Top up with USDT from the Fasset wallet. Beyond that, the starting data adds that XAUt (Tether Gold) can be converted to USDT and then spent, so a gold token can end up funding a purchase, just by way of USDT rather than directly.

That is the whole of it. Minimums, fees, arrival times, and — the one that bites hardest — networks are not stated.

That last omission deserves weight. When you send USDT, you are choosing a blockchain network, and different networks mean different costs, different speeds and different failure modes. Some networks require a small amount of their own native token to move anything: on Ethereum, for example, fees are paid in ETH, so a wallet holding USDT but no ETH cannot send it at all. If you send on a network your card provider does not support, or to an address belonging to a different network, the transfer can be lost or require a manual recovery request with no guarantee of success. Blockchain transfers are irreversible by design. Choosing the wrong network is the single most common and most consequential mistake a user of this kind of card can make.

I am not going to walk you through which network to pick, because the card does not publish the supported ones and guessing would be irresponsible. This is a question to ask support and get a written answer to before your first transfer.

Withdrawals are not stated either. Whether you can take money back out, to a bank account, to a wallet, or anywhere else, and what that costs, is not described. For a card you might use as your only card, that is a question that deserves an answer before you need it.

So the funding picture in one line: USDT in, spend USD out, gold can come along for the ride, and the practical details of how, when and at what cost are not on the page.

Paying with it every day

The everyday-use criterion is my lowest score, 4 out of 10, and it is low for a specific reason: this looks like a virtual card, and the existence of a physical one is unconfirmed. That is not a minor gap. A virtual card works well for subscriptions and online payments and poorly or not at all for anything that needs to be handed over.

So, honestly assessed, this is what I can and cannot confirm about daily use.

• Confirmed: Visa network, spending in USD, at Visa merchants worldwide.
• Not stated: physical card, card material, Apple Pay, Google Pay, any mobile wallet support at all.
• Not stated: which merchant categories are eligible for cashback, or which are excluded.
• Not stated: what happens to your card if it is lost, or whether you can freeze it instantly.

That last one matters more than it sounds. The standard safeguards a card provider is expected to offer — app-based two-factor authentication, instant card freeze, spending limits, 3-D Secure confirmation for online payments, tokenised mobile wallets — are standard in the category. Fasset’s own pages say nothing about which of them it offers. Whether the app even exists as an app is also unstated, and I found no App Store listing in my search.

That is worth pausing on. Many cards of this kind are unusable at a physical terminal for one specific reason, and it is not the card’s fault: merchants can look up the issuer identification number at the front of the card number and see which country issued it and what type of card it is. If that country differs from your billing address, some merchants apply extra scrutiny, and some simply decline prepaid or foreign-issued cards outright. Address verification, which compares the numeric parts of the billing address you typed against the issuer’s records, is mainly offered in the US, Canada and the UK and is generally unavailable for foreign-issued cards — which can cause declines. This is a category-wide phenomenon, not a mark against Fasset specifically, but it interacts badly with not knowing whether you have a physical card.

Two more everyday realities. A declined authorisation can leave a hold on your funds for several days, sometimes up to seven, which is confusing if you have not seen it before. And the round-up feature — spare change to the nearest dollar invested in XAU₮ — is the kind of thing that feels like a gift right up until you check what it has done to a month of spending.

What can go wrong

No complaints surfaced in my checking, and I want to be careful about how I say that. I found no official incident, and my searches for Fasset on Trustpilot and Reddit returned nothing — no Trustpilot page was found. With a product this new, silence in review sites is much more likely to mean “not enough users to have complained yet” than “no problems”. Treat the absence of complaints as no evidence at all.

The risks that matter are the ones I can reason about from what is published and what is missing.

You do not know who the issuer is. The card is Visa. The programme runs through Fasset. But the entity that actually issues the card is not named, and no licence numbers are published anywhere. Fasset Labuan Limited appears in the starting data as the company; Fasset describes itself as a US-founded neobanking and investment platform and lists regulatory approvals in the UAE, Indonesia, Malaysia, the EU, Turkey and Pakistan and “others”. Approvals listed without licence numbers are a claim; a licence number is a fact. If your card is stolen, disputed or frozen, the question of which regulated institution is responsible for you is not one the public pages answer.

Your money sits with a custodian. Control of crypto belongs to whoever holds the private key. With a custodial wallet — which is what a platform wallet generally is — the provider holds the credentials and you must trust them completely. This is not a hypothetical risk for the category: Mt. Gox reported roughly US$350 million stolen between 2011 and 2014, Coincheck about US$400 million in 2018, and the Ronin Network US$625 million in 2022. And because blockchain transfers are irreversible, a stolen private key has no built-in recovery. The network cannot freeze or return the funds.

Stablecoins can and have depegged. USDT is meant to hold a dollar, but despite the name, stablecoins are not necessarily stable. TerraUSD collapsed in May 2022. USDC temporarily lost its peg in March 2023 during the US banking crisis. Most of the stablecoin market sits in just two tokens — the BIS put about 90% of market capitalisation in Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC as of July 2025 — so the system is concentrated. The BIS also notes that Circle states USDC is redeemable 1:1 for dollars and fully backed by cash and cash equivalents, mostly in an SEC-registered government money market fund, with monthly reserve attestations. Tether describes USDT as a token built on multiple blockchains with reserves intended to back it 1-to-1. “Intended to back” and “state” are different verbs, and that difference is where your risk lives.

Tether is not censorship-proof, and that cuts both ways. Tether says it disables tokens in wallets on the OFAC sanctions list and has frozen funds tied to illicit activity. For an ordinary user that is reassuring in one direction and a reminder in another: the same machinery that freezes illicit funds is the machinery that could freeze yours if a compliance flag is wrong. This is also why country rules matter, and why I am not going to write anything about how to work around them.

A programme can simply close. Visa and Mastercard do not issue crypto cards to consumers themselves; they license issuers, and they can suspend a programme. Visa terminated its global agreements with FTX on 13 November 2022, and the FTX US debit card was wound down by its issuer. WaveCrest, a Visa issuer that supplied several crypto card brands, was suspended by Visa in Europe in 2018, closing every WaveCrest-issued Visa programme it ran. When programmes close, the pattern is usually a notice period, then spending and loading stop, then users are asked to withdraw remaining balances. That is what you should be mentally prepared for: your balance is the thing at risk, not your card.

Regulation around you is moving. In the EU, MiCA took legal effect in June 2023; its rules on stablecoins and asset-referenced tokens applied from 30 June 2024, and the remaining provisions, including the rules for crypto-asset service providers, from 30 December 2024. Under MiCA, stablecoins may be issued only by a credit institution or an electronic money institution. The transitional period lets providers already operating under national law continue only until 1 July 2026 or until they receive or are refused a MiCA authorisation, whichever comes first — a date that has now passed as of this review. ESMA maintains a register of authorised providers that you can check, and it is worth checking. Note also that a card is regulated separately from the crypto side: MiCA covers custody, exchange and transfer, while the card is a payment service under e-money and payments law. A crypto card often depends on two licences.

Disputes and consumer protection are unknown. What happens when a charge goes wrong is not stated: no dispute process is described, and prepaid-card coverage varies and should not be assumed. In the US, debit card reversal rights come from Regulation E and credit card rights from Regulation Z. If you are outside the US, the relevant protection is whatever your own jurisdiction gives you for prepaid instruments, which is often less than people expect.

Taxes. I am not giving tax advice here, but you should know that each of these payments may have a tax dimension. The IRS treats digital assets as property, so exchanging them for goods, services or dollars generally produces a taxable gain or loss, measured in local currency at fair market value on the date of the transaction. That means each card payment funded from crypto can be a separate disposal. Rules differ outside the US; a local accountant is the right person to ask, not me.

What to take instead

Three alternatives came up in my comparison, and each solves the same problem differently. Scores are on the same ten-point scale, which is why they sit close to Fasset’s.

International Visa Card — 6.7 / 10. A US-issued Platinum Visa, virtual, paying in USD, with a physical card listed as “Coming soon”. This is the clearest contrast with Fasset on two of the criteria Fasset scored lowest. Cost: virtual card issuance $5 one-time, no maintenance fee, with plans at Classic free, Pro $9.00/month and Max $19.00/month — a published number where Fasset publishes none. Fees: card use in USD is free on all plans; foreign currency is “Visa exchange rate + 2% FX fee”; deposits of any kind are free. Funding: USDC or USDT into the USD account at 1:1, plus USD, EUR, SEPA, SWIFT and FedNow. Eligibility is the catch and it is a real one — the card is not available to residents or legal registrants of Belarus, mainland China, North Korea, Cuba, India, Iraq, Iran, Israel, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, Russia, Syria, Turkey, Ukraine, Venezuela or Vietnam, with FATF grey-list countries reviewed case by case, and purchases are blocked in several of those jurisdictions. The rule is by residence or registration; citizenship is not mentioned. No cashback is stated.

UNi Card — 6.1 / 10. A multicurrency card on the Mastercard network, spending from the UNi.Global account balance. Its fee story is a clean sheet in a way Fasset’s is not: no annual fee, no foreign transaction fee, assets converted at live over-the-counter rates, and no hidden exchange fees, as the page puts it. Rewards are “Spend-to-Earn” up to 3% with the card, below Fasset’s headline rate but with the tiers implied rather than hidden. What it does not tell you: who can get it, how you fund it, and whether the card is physical or virtual.

Whop Cards — 5.2 / 10. Visa, working anywhere Visa is accepted online and in stores, spending from a Whop balance — a pending balance is usable as soon as a payment arrives, while standard withdrawals use settled funds. Starting data indicates the balance is backed by stablecoin collateral from a linked wallet, though coins and networks are not stated. Rewards are 5% cashback at select merchants, currently Uber, with more planned; payout currency and conditions not stated. The page says “No extra fees” without listing issuance or monthly amounts, and neither conversion nor FX fees are stated. Eligibility is the most defined of the three alternatives: consumers in 31 US states, businesses in 41, with unsupported consumer countries including Belarus, mainland China, Cuba, Hong Kong, India, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, North Korea, Russia, Syria, Turkey, Ukraine, Venezuela and Vietnam. Whether the test is citizenship or residence is not stated.

Drawn side by side, the honest comparison is this. Fasset wins on headline rewards and on the breadth of its intended country list, both of which are real. It loses on published costs, on identity of the issuer, and on how much of the everyday experience you can confirm. The alternatives publish their prices — one publishes them almost aggressively — which does not make them better, but does make them easier to compare, and comparison is what a card is used for.

Who I would recommend it to

I would recommend the Fasset card to someone specific, and I would tell everyone else to wait.

Recommend it if: you live in one of the 36 listed countries, your income already arrives as USDT or another stablecoin, you are paid in a currency your local bank would convert badly or not at all, you understand that a US-dollar balance held with a non-bank platform has different protections from a bank deposit, and you are genuinely excited by the gold-back rewards as an investment rather than as a cashback. For that person this is a coherent product doing a coherent thing, and 6% back in a gold token is a better reward than most of this category offers.

Tell them to wait if: you need a physical card. If the answer to “does it work at the till in front of me” is unconfirmed, that alone is disqualifying for daily life, and I would not find out at a checkout. Wait if your main worry is the cost of a transaction, because that number is not published. Wait if you are the kind of person who needs to know the name of the institution that issues your card, with a licence number to look up in a public register. Wait if you plan to hold a balance on it, since prepaid and e-money balances are not bank deposits and are not covered by deposit guarantee schemes. And wait if you intend to use it as your only card, because I could not find the answer to whether you can get cash out, and that is too basic a question to leave open.

If you do go ahead, the sequence I would follow is simple: verify your own country is accepted at sign-up rather than trusting the list; ask support in writing which networks USDT top-ups must be sent on and which address; ask what the conversion and FX treatment actually is; ask whether a physical card exists and how long delivery takes; and check the provider against ESMA’s register of authorised crypto-asset service providers, and any relevant regulator in the jurisdiction you live in. Then send a small test amount first, and only then a large one.

None of that is a barrier to opening an account. It is just what you do when the public page leaves the important boxes blank.

Frequently asked questions

What is Fasset card?

The Fasset card is a Visa card that spends US dollars at Visa merchants worldwide, funded from a crypto balance rather than a bank account. You top it up with USDT, and the balance is what pays for purchases. It sits alongside Fasset’s wider neobanking and investment platform rather than replacing a bank account, and Fasset positions it for people whose money already moves in stablecoins.

How does the Fasset card work?

You load a USD balance with USDT from the Fasset wallet, then spend it wherever Visa is accepted. Purchases on eligible transactions earn up to 6% back in XAU₮, gold-backed, credited to your wallet in real time, with tiers rising as your spending increases. A round-up feature invests spare change to the nearest dollar in XAU₮. How the crypto becomes a dollar balance is the part the public pages do not describe.

Is Fasset a bank?

Not one that the public pages identify. The company behind the card is Fasset Labuan Limited, and Fasset describes itself as a US-founded neobanking and investment platform founded by Mohammad Raafi Hossain and Daniel Ahmed, who is CEO. It lists regulatory approvals in the UAE, Indonesia, Malaysia, the EU, Turkey and Pakistan. But the card issuer is not named, and no licence numbers are published.

Who owns Fasset?

Fasset Labuan Limited is the entity named in the starting data for the card. Beyond that, the founders are Mohammad Raafi Hossain and Daniel Ahmed. One further connection is public: Tether announced a gold-backed Visa card with Fasset, though the announcement carries no date on the page where it appears. Tether also commits up to $1 million in XAU₮ to fund the rewards.

Can I use the Fasset card in my country?

Probably, if you live in one of the 36 jurisdictions in the starting data — Australia, Japan, Singapore, Pakistan, Egypt, Kenya, South Africa, Mexico, Panama and much of the Caribbean among them. Be aware this list came from starting data and the card’s own page returned an error when I checked it, so confirm at sign-up. The card’s spending reach is separate from your eligibility, and spending works at Visa merchants worldwide.

How do I get the Fasset card?

You would create an account on Fasset’s platform first, complete whatever identity verification the app requires, and obtain the card from there. What is not published: which documents are needed, how long approval takes, or what the application steps are. The card appears to be virtual, and whether a physical card exists, plus delivery times and shipping cost, are not stated.

Does the Fasset card require KYC?

The card’s own pages do not state the verification requirement. In practice, a regulated financial provider is legally obliged to verify customers and screen for sanctions, so assume some form of identity check applies and that it will ask for identity documentation. What Fasset does not publish is the standard, the document list, or the processing time. Regulated providers must also screen by nationality separately from residence.

How do I top up the Fasset card?

With USDT from the Fasset wallet. Starting data also indicates XAUt, Tether’s gold token, can be converted into USDT and then spent. The practical details are missing: minimum amounts, fees, arrival times and — most importantly — which blockchain networks are supported. Getting that wrong can lose the funds outright, because blockchain transfers cannot be reversed. Ask before your first transfer.

Is the Fasset card safe?

There is no evidence of problems, and also no evidence of a long track record — I found no Trustpilot page and no Reddit discussion, which for a product this new probably means few users rather than few problems. What the pages do not mention: two-factor authentication, instant card freeze, spending limits, or the name of the issuer. Your balance is held by a platform rather than a bank, so deposit guarantee protection should not be assumed.

Is the Fasset card worth it?

If you are paid in stablecoins and spend in dollars, the mechanics work and the rewards are better than most — up to 6% back in XAU₮. If you need a physical card, published prices, or the name of a licensed issuer, the public pages do not give you enough to judge it. The tier thresholds behind that 6% are unpublished, so the rate you would actually earn is not knowable in advance. Read it as promising and unproven.

Content created by the «cryptocardcheck» team