Virtual crypto cards, seven volume tiers, and a fee that starts at 4.5%

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

FBM is not a bank and does not try to be one. It is a platform that turns a crypto balance into virtual Mastercard and Visa card numbers you can pay online with, issued instantly and in any quantity, with the price of the card and the price of loading it both tied to how much you move through the platform in a month. That structure is the whole card in one sentence, and it is worth holding on to through the rest of this review, because almost every surprise in this product comes from that one design choice.

I scored it 4.7 out of 10. That is not a rounding of something better or worse — it is the sum of six separate marks, and I show the arithmetic below so you can disagree with one row instead of the whole verdict. The short version: the top-up options are unusually strong, the cost side is the weakest of the six, and everyday use is thin because there are no physical cards, no stated mobile wallet support and no ATM.

This is written for anyone who has trouble getting an ordinary bank card, or who holds crypto and wants a card number without waiting for a bank to approve one. Country and citizenship rules below are told as FBM itself states them, which is to say: mostly not at all. If that gap matters to your situation, treat it as the first thing to check before anything else.

Conditions are current as of October 28, 2026.

The score, and who this card actually suits

The total is 4.7 / 10. Here is how it breaks down.

Two audiences come out of this clearly. The first is teams and businesses issuing many virtual cards funded from USDT — anyone who needs ten, fifty or five hundred card numbers issued in seconds, controlled individually, is served better by this than by anything aimed at individuals, and the tier pricing rewards exactly that volume. The second is an individual with a stablecoin balance who needs a card number for online subscriptions and has a comfortable margin for error on cost.

Who it does not suit: anyone who wants a physical card in the post, anyone who wants to tap at a terminal every day, anyone who needs a card number accepted everywhere without declines, and anyone who needs their money back quickly at low cost. The $500 minimum on a USDT top-up also makes it a poor fit for small, irregular spending.

One more framing, because “crypto card” hides a structural fact. A card number starts with a six- or eight-digit issuer identification number, the BIN, which tells any merchant which institution and country issued it. Merchants can look that up and apply extra scrutiny when the issuer country differs from the billing address — which is why a card issued in one country looks “foreign” in another. FBM’s BINs come from Hong Kong, the US, Singapore, Colombia and others, and it does not let you choose which. So the acceptance you get is partly a lottery about which BIN you were handed.

Will they give you the card

Yes to almost anyone who completes the checks, and FBM says so plainly: full KYC is applied to all clients. What that means in practice for you is that identity verification is not a tier perk or an extra step for large balances. It is the door.

What is not stated is as important as what is. FBM does not name countries on its pages, so there is no published list telling you whether residents of your country are accepted or excluded. Required documents are not stated: no list of passports or national IDs, no proof-of-address requirement published, no age threshold given beyond the general pattern for prepaid and debit cards, which are generally available to adults aged 18 and over, sometimes with higher limits at some issuers. KYC levels — that is, whether verification is stepped or tiered by amount — are not stated either.

That gap is not automatically a warning. Many platforms publish nothing about their country policy and simply run the standard checks. But it means the honest answer to “can I get one where I live” is: probably, subject to the checks passing, and you cannot confirm it from the public pages before you try. If being refused after doing the work would cost you something real, weigh that before you start.

How to get it

The mechanics are short, which is part of the appeal. You create an account, complete KYC, and request a card. What you get is described as virtual cards only — no physical card is issued and nothing is delivered, so there is no waiting period and no shipping to think about.

The card itself comes as a Mastercard or Visa BIN, in Credit, Debit or Corporate type. FBM says it holds 10+ BINs originating from Hong Kong, the US, Singapore, Colombia and other countries, and it names them as “10+ USD BINs” — the cards are denominated in US dollars. Cards are issued instantly, and you can hold any number of them.

• Cards issued instantly, no waiting and no delivery
• Mastercard and Visa BINs, in Credit, Debit and Corporate types
• 10+ BINs from HK, US, SG, CO and others, all USD-denominated
• Card currency: USD; multi-currency is not stated
• No physical card option

The number of cards is a real feature rather than a footnote. Spending limits are set per card by you, with an example given of $1,000 per card alongside daily and monthly limits. That makes a many-card setup manageable: each card can be capped, frozen or abandoned without affecting the others. It also makes one wrong card number a small problem rather than a large one.

Fees: what it really costs

Here is the honest cost picture, and it is the weakest part of the product. Two things drive everything: the card issuance fee on the lower tiers, and a top-up commission that starts at 4.5% and falls only as your monthly volume grows.

One inconsistency is worth flagging before you plan around it. The card fee is described as $2 on the Start, Basic and Advanced tiers, and free from Pro upward. But the FAQ also gives the range as “$0–3”, and elsewhere the site says “from $3 to $0”. Those three statements do not agree, so treat the exact card price as unsettled and confirm it at the point of purchase.

The commission is charged by monthly volume, and this is the design that decides whether FBM suits you. At the bottom, on Start, you pay 4.5% to load the card. That is not a small number against everyday spending — it is a visible haircut on every top-up, and no amount of careful use reduces it. You only reach 3% by pushing $100,000–250,000 a month through the platform, which is a business-scale number, not a personal one. For an individual, 4.5% is effectively the real price of using this card.

The perks stack the other way. Pro and above get 24/7 support and free cards; Private adds a personal manager and custom BINs. So the tiers are built so that the people paying the most in fees are the ones who get the cheapest cards and the best support, and the person paying $2 per card pays the 4.5%.

Now three everyday payments, and which of those fees actually touch them:

A $30 subscription, paid monthly, on a Start tier. No transaction fee applies, so the card itself does not add anything here. But the money has to arrive first: if you top up $500 of USDT to cover several months, the 4.5% Start commission is charged on that $500. There is no transaction fee and no decline fee, so the extra cost is entirely the loading step.

A $45 online order paid in euros. The FX spread applies, and this is the one that catches people. A “standard 1% bank spread” on $45 is $0.45, on top of whatever the merchant’s own pricing does. There is still no per-transaction fee on top of it. Over a year of similar payments the spread is the largest recurring cost you will notice after the top-up commission.

A $12 top-up on a small balance. Here the cost is not the rate but the threshold. The stated minimum is $500, so a $12 top-up is not available at all. Anyone spending lightly is pushed into over-funding and paying commission on money they have not spent yet.

Read together: the no-transaction-fee part is genuinely good, and the 1% FX spread is ordinary for the category. What makes the cost mark a 3 is the combination of a 4.5% starting commission, a $500 minimum, and a $2 card fee on the tiers an individual would actually be on.

How to top it up

This is the section FBM scores highest, and the reason is concrete. USDT on TRC-20 and ERC-20, with a $500 minimum, credited in 1–3 minutes after confirmation. USDC is also supported per the starting data. A bank wire from $5,000 is the other route. Fee is the per-tier commission from the table above; who pays the network fee is not stated.

• USDT on TRC-20 or ERC-20, minimum $500
• Credited in 1–3 minutes after confirmation
• USDC supported per the starting data
• Bank wire from $5,000
• Per-tier top-up commission, from 4.5% down to from 2%
• Network fee payer not stated

For a reader who already holds USDT, this is the good part of the product, and I want to explain why rather than just assert it. Stablecoins are meant to hold a stable value against a currency, and Tether’s USDT and Circle’s USDC are both dollar-pegged — the BIS (July 2025) put about 90% of stablecoin market capitalisation in these two. Circle says USDC is redeemable 1:1 for US dollars and fully backed by cash and cash equivalents, mostly in a SEC-registered government money market fund, with monthly reserve attestations by a Big Four firm. Circle lists USDC as natively supported on 38 networks as of 16 September 2026, and Tether describes USDT as a token built on multiple blockchains with reserves intended to back it one-to-one.

Two networks matter to you here because they are the two FBM accepts. ERC-20 is the Ethereum token standard, proposed in November 2015; on it, gas is paid only in ETH, which means a wallet holding USDT with no ETH cannot send. TRC-20 runs on Tron, where fees are paid through bandwidth and energy resources, often burning TRX. If you are comparing, know that the network you already use may dictate which one you pick.

Two warnings the platform’s own design implies. First, blockchain transfers are irreversible, so a deposit sent on a network FBM does not support, or to an address belonging to another network, can be lost or need manual support recovery with no guarantee. Get the network right. Second, stablecoins can depeg — TerraUSD collapsed in May 2022, and USDC temporarily lost its peg in March 2023 during the US banking crisis. The word “stable” is a description of intent, not a promise.

There is also a network subtlety that trips people up on the *other* currency: Circle stopped supporting USDC on Tron in February 2024, so “USDC over TRC20” is not a native option. FBM lists USDT on both networks and USDC without naming networks, which leaves that question open.

Paying with it every day

The daily experience is where this card is thinnest, and the 3 / 10 here is not a close call. You get card numbers that work at online merchants and you set the rules per card. What you do not get, per the public pages: no dedicated app, Apple Pay and Google Pay not stated, and no ATM — which follows from virtual-only, but it means no cash, ever.

What there is instead is workable and unlovely: a browser dashboard that is usable on a phone, a Telegram bot for 3-D Secure codes and alerts, an API, and export to CSV, Excel or Google Sheets. For a person spending from a phone, that is a dashboard in a browser and a Telegram chat — workable, and not what a mainstream payment app feels like. No cashback is mentioned. Wallets are not stated.

The 3-D Secure piece deserves a moment, because it is what you will meet most often. Three-D Secure adds an identity check to online card payments: the issuer assesses the risk and either approves without friction or challenges you, for example with a one-time code or a biometric. Visa’s brand is Visa Secure, Mastercard’s is Identity Check, and EMV 3-D Secure 2 — published in 2016 — supports one-time passcodes and app-based authentication aligned with EU strong customer authentication. Getting those codes through a Telegram bot rather than a banking app is the everyday friction here.

Two things will make online payments decline that have nothing to do with your balance. Address Verification Service compares the numeric parts of the billing address you type — street number, ZIP — against issuer records; it is mainly offered in the US, Canada and the UK, and is generally unavailable for foreign-issued cards, which can cause declines. And some merchants decline prepaid or foreign BINs because the BIN lookup reveals both the card type and the issuer country. With a card whose BIN you did not choose, that is a real chance of a refusal at checkout.

One useful reassurance, and one caveat. If a payment is declined, that is not necessarily a fee or a lost payment — declined authorisations may leave a hold on funds that can remain for several days, typically up to 7. But you should not assume the chargeback protection you would have from an ordinary bank card. A chargeback is a refund ordered by the issuer to settle a dispute, with reason codes such as fraud, duplicate billing or goods not received; US debit card reversal rights come from Regulation E and credit card rights from Regulation Z, while prepaid-card coverage varies and should not be assumed. Disputes on FBM are not stated at all.

What can go wrong

Counterparty risk, the big one. FBM says client funds are held in segregated accounts and that transactions are monitored in real time, with per-card limits and a custodial platform balance. That is a claim on its website, and segregation is the standard the industry works to — electronic money institutions must safeguard customer funds by segregating them in dedicated accounts or insuring them. But such funds are not the same as bank deposits and may not be covered by deposit guarantee schemes. Holding funds with a custodian also carries counterparty and hack risk: Mt. Gox (about US$350 million reported stolen, 2011–2014), Coincheck (about US$400 million in 2018) and the Ronin Network (US$625 million in 2022) are the reference points. And the platform is custodial, which means whoever holds the credentials holds control of the funds.

Programme-closure risk. This is the one that catches people by surprise, and it has nothing to do with fraud. Card programmes end. Visa said in November 2022 that it had “terminated our global agreements with FTX”, and the FTX US debit card programme was wound down by its issuer. WaveCrest, a Visa issuer that supplied crypto card brands, was suspended by Visa in Europe in 2018, closing all WaveCrest-issued Visa programmes. Closures typically follow a pattern: a notice period, then spending and loading stop, then users are asked to withdraw remaining balances. One 2026 closure reported by a secondary source had new loads ending 8 July 2026 and spending stopping 8 August 2026 — a single unconfirmed source, so treat the dates as illustrative rather than proven.

Who is behind it. The stated address is Unit 1903, 19/F, Tower 2, Lippo Centre, 89 Queensway, Admiralty, Hong Kong. FBM says it has operated since 2024. The issuer is not named. That is a specific and unusual gap: the party that actually holds your card programme and stands behind it is the one thing the pages do not tell you. In the standard structure the card network routes the messages and sets the rules, the issuer is the bank or e-money institution licensed to issue under that network’s licence, and the crypto brand is often only a programme manager or front end. Ask who the issuer is before you load.

Regulatory exposure. A crypto card often depends on two licences, because the card itself is a payment service regulated separately under e-money and payment-services law, while the crypto side is covered by markets-in-crypto-assets rules. In the EU, MiCA is that regulation: ESMA states it took legal effect in June 2023, with rules on asset-referenced and e-money tokens applying from 30 June 2024 and the remaining provisions including crypto-asset service provider rules from 30 December 2024. Under Article 48, e-money tokens may be issued only by a credit institution or an electronic money institution. The transitional period lets providers operating under national law continue only until 1 July 2026 or until they receive or are refused a MiCA authorisation, whichever comes first. ESMA keeps an interim register of authorised CASPs that you can check a provider against. In the US, FinCEN guidance FIN-2013-G001 treats administrators and exchangers of convertible virtual currency as money transmitters.

Not enough on file about complaints. I looked for a Trustpilot page for fbm.cards and found none; the same goes for Reddit pages. The site itself claims a TrustScore of 5 from 215 reviews, which is unverified and which I am passing on as the site’s own claim rather than as a fact. No official incident came up in searching, and FBM’s own news is not stated. Absence of complaints from a platform this young is weakly informative — it can mean nothing went wrong, and it can also mean there are not enough users to have complained yet.

The account-closure question. Nobody publishes a clear answer to “how do I get my money out if I stop using this”. The withdrawal terms are: back to a USDT wallet within 24 hours, no amount limit, and a 1% withdrawal fee. What is not stated is the balance at closure — whether a fee-free exit exists, and on what terms. Combined with an unnamed issuer, that is the part I would want an answer to in writing before committing meaningful money.

Getting blocked mid-payment. Issuer-side restrictions are routine: a card issuer can restrict a tokenised number, for example block it on magnetic-stripe, phone or website use. And on the merchant side, many issuers block MCC 7995, gambling — casinos, betting, lotteries — by policy rather than by law, with the blocked list varying by issuer.

What to take instead

I pulled three comparable cards, and I want to walk through them with you rather than just declare a winner, because the honest answer is that all four of these are thin on the same details.

Cardex is the one to look at first if you want a card you can hold. It offers virtual and physical cards, and it runs on four networks including Visa, Mastercard and UnionPay — broader acceptance than FBM’s virtual-only setup. Its claim of “one crypto card, 200+ countries” is about reach, not a published eligibility list. Two cautions: its App Store listing is Naira-focused, with payment in naira and the card currency given as naira, which suggests a market focus rather than a global one; and its headline feature — an AI-powered conversion rate that scans global exchange rates and picks the best at the moment you spend — comes with no stated percentage fee. A conversion mechanism described in marketing language with no number attached is a question, not an answer.

CardFlow targets Nigeria explicitly (“Nigeria’s smartest fintech card platform”) while claiming to serve “Nigerians and global users”. Its virtual USD Mastercard is created in about 3 minutes, and creating one is completely free, which beats FBM’s $2 outright. It accepts Bitcoin, USDT, ETH or a Naira bank transfer. Its fees are not stated, and that silence is the problem: you cannot tell whether the free creation is offset elsewhere.

HyperCard scores the same 4.7 as FBM. It is a prepaid card with a balance in USD or EUR, deposits of crypto such as USDT, BTC or ETH in the app, and the balance converted to USD or EUR on the card. Its App Store page says the card works in “more than 176 countries” — and I want to be precise about that, because it is an acceptance claim, not an eligibility claim. It does not tell you who can open an account. Fees, network and cost are not stated on the pages I could read.

The pattern across all four: none of them publishes a country eligibility list, and none states ATM support. FBM’s distinguishing advantages over this field are its volume-based commission schedule, its instant multi-card issuance, and the widest spread of named BIN countries. Its disadvantages are the $500 minimum, the $2 card fee on individual tiers, and virtual-only.

Who I would recommend it to

Recommend it if you run a business that issues many virtual cards from a USDT balance and can push real monthly volume — that is where the pricing curve works in your favour, where free cards appear, where 24/7 support appears, and where instant issuance of unlimited card numbers with per-card limits actually saves you operational work. I would also recommend it to an individual holding stablecoins who mostly pays online subscriptions, can comfortably pre-fund $500 or more, and treats the 4.5% as a known cost of convenience rather than a surprise.

Do not recommend it if you need cash, a physical card, or a card in your phone’s wallet. Do not recommend it if your spending is small or irregular and the $500 minimum would leave most of your balance sitting in commission. Do not recommend it if a 4.5% loading fee on every top-up is not acceptable to you at your volume, because no amount of careful use changes it. And do not recommend it if you need a named issuer, a published country list, a clear dispute process or a stated account-closure exit — those are not on the public pages.

Before you load anything, four things I would want answers to: which bank or e-money institution is the issuer; whether residents of your country are accepted, since that is not published; what happens to your balance at closure, since the closure balance is not stated; and the actual card price, since the site gives $2, “$0–3” and “from $3 to $0” in three places. Check the provider against the ESMA interim register of authorised CASPs as well, which is a free check and tells you about the crypto side that no card description covers.

None of this is tax or legal advice, and I am not going to pretend otherwise. One thing worth knowing without anyone advising you on it: the IRS treats digital assets as property, so exchanging them for goods, services, dollars or other digital assets generally produces a taxable gain or loss, measured in local fiat currency at fair market value on the date of the transaction — which means each card payment funded from crypto may be a separate disposal. Your own jurisdiction’s treatment may differ entirely. Speak to a professional about yours.

Frequently asked questions

What is the FBM card?

FBM is a crypto payment platform that issues virtual Mastercard and Visa card numbers you fund from a stablecoin balance. It says it has operated since 2024 from an address in Hong Kong, and it issues cards instantly with no physical card and no delivery. The cards come in Credit, Debit and Corporate types, denominated in US dollars, drawn from 10+ BINs in Hong Kong, the US, Singapore, Colombia and elsewhere.

Is FBM a bank?

No, and it presents itself as a platform rather than a bank. Its address is Unit 1903, 19/F, Tower 2, Lippo Centre, 89 Queensway, Admiralty, Hong Kong. Critically, the issuer of the cards is not named on the public pages — so the licensed bank or e-money institution actually standing behind the card programme is the one party you are not told about.

Does the FBM card require KYC?

Yes, and for everyone: the page says KYC procedures apply to all clients, not only high balances. What is not stated is which documents you need, whether proof of address is required, or whether KYC is stepped by amount. In practice expect identity verification as anti-money-laundering law requires, with no published shortcut.

Which countries can use the FBM card?

The card’s public pages do not name countries, so there is no eligibility list to check. FBM applies full KYC to all clients regardless. Note the separate question of where the card works: the 10+ BINs come from Hong Kong, the US, Singapore, Colombia and others, and merchants can look up the BIN and decline foreign or prepaid cards.

How much does it cost to top up the FBM card?

Top-up commission runs on monthly volume: 4.5% on Start ($0–20k), 4% on Basic ($20–50k), 3.5% on Advanced ($50–100k), 3% on Pro ($100–250k), 2.8% on Enterprise ($250–500k), 2.5% on Elite ($500k–1M) and from 2% on Private (from $1M). There are no transaction fees and no decline fees, and the FX spread is a standard 1%.

Is the FBM card free?

Not for an individual. Cards cost $2 each on Start, Basic and Advanced, and are free from Pro upward. The site’s own figures are inconsistent — $2, “$0–3” and “from $3 to $0” appear in different places — so confirm the price at purchase rather than relying on a page. Pro and above also get 24/7 support.

How do I top up the FBM card?

USDT on TRC-20 or ERC-20, with a minimum of $500, credited within 1–3 minutes after confirmation. USDC is supported per the starting data, and bank wire starts at $5,000. Blockchain transfers are irreversible, so a deposit on an unsupported network or to another network’s address can be lost with no guarantee of recovery.

Can I use the FBM card in Apple Pay or Google Pay?

Not according to the public pages, which state neither — the platform lists only a browser dashboard usable on phones, a Telegram bot for 3-D Secure codes and alerts, an API and export to CSV, Excel or Google Sheets. There is no dedicated app. With virtual cards only and no ATM, there is also no way to withdraw cash.

Is the FBM card safe?

FBM states that client funds are held in segregated accounts and that transactions are monitored in real time, with per-card limits you control. Segregated funds are not the same as bank deposits and may not be covered by a deposit guarantee scheme. There is also programme-closure risk independent of any wrongdoing, as the FTX and WaveCrest cases show.

How do I withdraw money from FBM?

Withdrawals go back to a USDT wallet within 24 hours, with no amount limit, and a 1% withdrawal fee. The balance and terms at account closure are not stated, which is the detail I would want confirmed in writing before committing meaningful money, especially given that the card issuer is not named.

Content created by the «cryptocardcheck» team